Browse Sections
Interactive
Popular Sections
RainNews
| 
Submit Comments
Health 'victory' for protest group
4/ 2/2006
THE potential health risks of any development on the old Turner Brothers asbestos factory site will be considered before any building plans are given the go-ahead.
Government experts are to carry out a full health impact assessment, which will take into account the effect of any building work on the neighbourhood, before councillors can consider a 600-home plan.
The long-awaited breakthrough comes after a fierce 18-month campaign, during which residents have voiced grave fears about asbestos contamination on the Rooley Moor Road site. It has been welcomed by Save Spodden Valley's Jason Addy, especially as the Health Protection Agency review will include a public consultation.
He said: "This is good news as we have been asking for this assessment for a long time.
"It is such a huge planning application that the issue of asbestos contamination must be looked at, along with contamination from other nasty substances like benzene. We are grateful this issue is now receiving the attention it deserves."
Head of planning Ken Smith announced the launch of the review at a meeting with representatives from various bodies, including director of public health Dr Sheila Will.
The planning application has been put on hold while the council also waits for independent consultants, Atkins Global, to release their report on possible contamination.
Mr Smith said: "Right from the outset, Dr Will has said we will have to undertake a health impact assessment into how the developers handle the contamination. It will be pointless starting the assessment immediately while we wait for the Atkins Global report.
"This will be made public soon and, while it is not the be-all and end-all, it will take us on to the next stage in dealing with this application. I don't know what the full details of the health impact assessment will be but it will involve a consultation with local people and will have to take into account the history of the site."
Most recent 1 of 1 user comments
Got an opinion you want to share?| Card | BT Fee |
| Virgin Credit Card | 2.98% |
| Capital One BT Platinum Card | 3.0% |
| Egg Card | 3.0% |
| Tesco Bonus Credit Card | 2.9% |
| Capital One BT Exclusive | 3.0% |
| Company | Typical APR |
| Platinum Exclusive Loan | 7.5% |
| Moneyback Bank | 7.8% |
| Barclays | 7.9% |
| Sainsbury's Personal Loan | 8.5% |
| Halifax (Semi-exclusive) | 8.6% |
| Bank of Scotland (Semi-exclusive) | 8.6% |
| Alliance & Leicester | 8.7% |
| Provider | AER* |
|
ICICI BANK HiSAVE Savings Account |
6.16% |
|
SAINSBURYS FINANCE Internet Saver |
5.50% |
|
EGG BANKING PLC Egg Savings Account (Internet) |
6.55% |
|
ING DIRECT Savings Account |
6.50% |
|
TESCO PERSONAL FINANCE Internet Saver |
6.50% |
|
CITIBANK Flexible Saver Issue 4 |
6.43% |
|
ABBEY Instant Access Saver (Special Issue 2) |
6.30% |
|
ALLIANCE & LEICESTER Online Tracker |
6.30% |
|
ALLIANCE & LEICESTER eSaver - Issue 2 |
6.60% |
|
HALIFAX Web Saver Extra |
6.00% |
|
ABBEY eSaver Direct |
6.50% |
|
BRITANNIA BS DirectSaver Reserve Account |
6.25% |
It is a virtually free gamble for them- but their gamble could affect the health of Rochdale.
They said that asbestos was not a problem. They said that there was no exposed asbestos on the site. They said that there was a particular absence of asbestos. Their dodgy assertions have been proven WRONG.
Why should Rochdale council tax payers pay for MMC and Countryside Properties' mistakes?
If you buy a second hand car with no MOT you cannot legally drive it on the road. No 'assurances' from you that everything is OK would satisfy a policeman. You would need an MOT - a document that you would have to pay out of your own pocket. The council wouldn't be forced to pay to have a dodgy second hand car tested - SO WHY SHOULD TAXPAYERS PAY FOR A PROPER HEALTH CHECK? The developers have made a commerical decision to buy and apply for planning permission on an asbestos factory. An ASBESTOS factory- were they really expecting no need to establish proper safeguards? But then again... they did sneek on to the site at dawn on a Saturday morning to destroy the woodland... That really did set the standard of behaviour we were to expect, and continue to see, time and time again.
15/02/2006 at 09:00