THE Council is planning to build new municipal offices in the town centre at an estimated cost of almost £70M.
The old Yelloway site, off Smith Street, has been earmarked.
It is planned for the bulk of the 2,500 council staff across the borough to be switched to the new offices, allowing the council to get rid of 35 of the 80 council-owned buildings.
It is believed that the cost of the new offices – to replace the Black Box – would be less than the cost of maintaining existing buildings, currently estimated at £90M over the next 25 to 30 years.
Council officer Mark Widdup said: "This new building is ambitious, a lot of the existing council buildings are not fit for purpose."
The new plans have been criticised by councillors, who believe that the disposal of buildings to assist with the new development would be opposed by local residents.
Councillor Brian Davies said: "The idea to sell off the family silver to fund the centre of Rochdale at a cost of up to £70M is awful.
"The Town Hall is essentially not fit for purpose, but it’s something which we tolerate. If you made everything fit for purpose the Town Hall would die."
Councillor Wera Hobhouse also raised concerns about the history of some of the buildings which could face demolition.
She said: "Some of these assets are part of our local heritage and we need to preserve them."
A development company has already submitted an outline plan for the new Town Centre offices and now has until the summer to produce a more detailed plan.
The offices are in addition to the bus station, to which the government is releasing £10M towards the expected £11.5M cost.
But the closure of the current bus station has raised concerns regarding the loss of the multi-storey car park above it.
Donald Forrester, the head of highways, said: "We’re on the case. We’ve done some studies, with the Yelloway site coming off stream, it leaves us with a shortfall in long stay parking."
He said a site on Entwisle Road would be an ideal replacement.
"We’re going to make sure that the car parking that is currently available remains available."

Sign up to the weekly
news
Most recent user comments 7 of 7
What goes around comes around.
Looks like it is pay back time for those who gave so generaously to party funds in their time of need.
2/04/2008 at 14:52 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Unelected bodies ruling our lives (RDA) and elected bodies (RMBC) taking no notice of the people that they are supposed to represent. We all agree that Rochdale needs to be sorted out but there is a lot more things that need to be sorted out before new offices for our councillors and there staff. Aren’t these the same people that told us thirty years ago that the Black Box was an investment for Rochdale's future? Well has anyone asked if it has been paid for yet? These are also the same people that are telling us that 'It will be cheaper' to build new than maintain what they currently have, well how can that work? Come on!
31/03/2008 at 09:30 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
God help us with you lot on the case Donald.
30/03/2008 at 13:38 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
30/03/2008 at 09:43 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
29/03/2008 at 21:56 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Was the reason because senior officers at Rochdale Council were in a rush to do a deal with a private developer? Does this developer happen to own some land close to where Rochdale Council want to build Yelloway House- their new £70 million office development that has just been announced in today’s Observer?
Part of this new deal for Rochdale Council is to dispose of dozens of its properties through the Borough?
How accountable will this be?
Why are tens of millions of pounds of council assets to be sold during a property slump?
There needs to be a thorough public investigation of the way Rochdale Council has sold, and intends to sell its assets off. After all it is our money. The investigation must start with a simple list of council property assets that have been sold off in the last 10 years, cross referenced with any local developers that have clear links with local politicians and council officers.
If nothing is wrong then there is nothing to hide.
29/03/2008 at 14:50 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.
Here is why…
Firstly, we have been bombarded with PR drivel from Rochdale Council and the RDA giving the impression that the public have been fully consulted. This has been a sham. Today’s Observer gives us another clue in the wholesale deceit.
Yelloway House. The contracts for this project were drafted before the public consultation. RMBC and RDA made little mention of it. Public attention was distracted with talk of new shopping centres and iconic monuments.
The decision to demolish major council offices such as the Black Box and Telegraph House was made many months ago. The Electric House was demolished over a year ago. Now it is made public that more civic silver is to be sold off in order to build a mega-office on the former Yelloway coach site - otherwise known as the floodplain next to the fragrant River Roch.
Who benefits from this major sweep of the Monopoly board? Surely the Council and GMPTE if their buildings are demolished and the sites sold to developers as a clean slate £250 million project? Not really, as the world of civic accountancy is more complicated than that. The capital reserves that are accrued get spent. We won’t see our council tax bills reduce.
In fact, it all gets worse. In the style of numpty lottery winners, our council is to go on a shopping spree. Why are they spending £70 million for new offices in a town that has ample office space at a time of commercial property recession?
Who really runs Rochdale? It isn’t the elected representatives. They come and go. The main people are the senior officers- that is why people like the Chief Executive and department heads get paid so much. But there are also new kids on the block too. These are the shadowy figures from the private finance and local authority management industry.
So there we have it. Our town centre will probably be owned by overseas property investment trusts. Hundreds of millions of our money is processed by a private company running our council services. Hundreds of millions will go to civil engineering companies on demolition and property projects we don’t really need. Our overpriced car parks remain owned or managed by private companies. Too many senior council officers, consultants and agency directors are each being paid over a hundred thousand pounds a year.
Who ultimately pays for this greed and mismanagement?
We do.
29/03/2008 at 13:43 Offensive or Inappropriate?
Please let us know the reason you find the above comment inappropriate.